Outricher / research / brighty-app · ICP dataset · Data Analyst

Data Analyst: who will close the measured gap in analytics.

This is a candidate dataset for the ICP from report №5 — the sixth and final role of six. This is not an assumed gap but a measured one: per Brighty's own team data, the "Data / Analytics" function = 0 current, 1 departed (100% attrition), and the Data Analyst vacancy was opened and closed twice. After the round, investors demand unit economics, retention cohorts, CAC/LTV and the product funnel — without an analyst, B2C growth under a geo-gate runs blind. We assembled a live, verified, contact-ready pool of product/growth analysts from fintech, crypto and CIS-tech donor companies — focused on the exact level Brighty actually needs. Not a raw list — data engineering built to the brief: who, why now, how we found them, and — honestly, who we flagged for review.

1,372
analysts in Brighty's hiring zone
370
in the dataset, enriched (avg 143 fields)
275
rising product/growth analyst (the main bet)
308
active in analytics now (+54 alumni)

prepared 2026-06-28 · MEASURED · Outricher data

01The hiring problem: a gap you can see in the numbers

In report №5 and the team breakdown (report №2), the gap is measured, not assumed: the "Data / Analytics" function = 0 current employees, 1 departed — the only analyst in company history left and was never replaced (100% attrition). Across the hiring history (68 postings), the Data Analyst vacancy was opened exactly 2 times — following the same "hard to fill" pattern as MLRO (×6) and CISO (×4). The need is recognized but structurally unresolved.

An important honest correction to the ICP: the Growth function at Brighty is NOT empty — Marketing/Growth = 3 current people (0 attrition). The real gap is specifically the analytical data owner, not a "head of growth". So the role is positioned as a product/growth analyst who delivers the numbers to the Growth and product teams — retention, unit economics, CAC/LTV, the funnel — not as a new head of growth. The round context (Series A, $10M) is presented as an external fact (in our team data, funding = null), not as our own measurement. Below: 1,372 analysts already working at Brighty's donor companies, named and with contacts.

02The universe: where we source from

Current Data / Product / Growth / BI Analysts, Analytics Engineers and Head/Lead of Analytics at Brighty's donor companies — fintech, crypto and CIS-tech (Revolut, Vinted, Nexo, Bitpanda, Paysera, kevin., Nordigen, TransferGo + the Yandex/Sberbank/BTSDigital data schools, whose graduates have already relocated to Brighty's hubs), in the geography where Brighty actually hires (EU/EEA + Switzerland + UK + UAE; LT/LV/EE and Dubai are its hubs). This is an honest "floor" for the named set of companies — the full graph is larger.

Donor companyAnalysts (current, in hiring zone)
Revolut806
Vinted248
Yandex148
Sberbank79
Nexo27
Bitpanda23
TransferGo15
kevin.13
Nordigen6
BTSDigital3
Paysera3
Wirex1
Total (before quota and deduplication)1,372
Honest note on dataset composition: the pool is concentrated. The 130/donor quota smooths the skew but does not remove it: by volume the graph is dominated by four large donors. In the actual dataset (370), Revolut + Vinted + Yandex + Sberbank account for 312 (84%). Boutique Baltic fintechs (Paysera/kevin./Nordigen) and small crypto firms (Wirex) are thin in the graph for this role — we included them for geo precision, but they are narrow slices, not the backbone of the pool. Here is the real composition by donor:
DonorIn dataset (actual)Share
Revolut9325%
Vinted8423%
Yandex7921%
Sberbank5615%
Nexo216%
Bitpanda175%
TransferGo72%
kevin.62%
Nordigen41%
Paysera10%
Wirex10%
BTSDigital10%
The Revolut↔Brighty corridor — proven. Brighty's CTO and ×7 of the team came from Revolut. That is both a cultural fit and a warm referral channel: already-moved compatriots make outreach to their former analyst colleagues warmer. 93 candidates are current Revolut analysts. The bloodline is filtered down to relevant fintech/tech sources — noisy co-employer records (single-person construction/telecom firms) were excluded at the search stage.
Honest note on method: GitHub is a bonus, not a filter. The original ICP over-promised "GitHub verification". The truth: a typical product / BI analyst on Looker / Tableau / Amplitude has no public GitHub — it mostly belongs to engineers. If we made GitHub a mandatory filter, we would discard most legitimate analysts. So the hard filter is title + geo + domain of past employers, while the stack (SQL / Python / dbt / BI / product tools) and method are detected in the profile text as a ranking boost. We only factor GitHub into the technical branch (Analytics Engineer).
Honest note on status: who is in the role now, and who is an "alum". We attach a candidate to a donor by their analytics role — but a person may have moved on. So we check the current title and split the pool: 308 are active in analytics right now, 54 are "alumni" (were analysts at a donor, now in an adjacent role — a warm, domain-relevant lead). Those who moved into non-analytical leadership (CMO, Product Director, COO) are flagged and demoted below the hot tier — the hot shortlist stays hireable analysts, not people who need a VP offer. The da_current_status fields and segments are in the dataset.

03Two tiers: the main bet is the rising middle

Brighty needs a working analyst, not a data team built around one. So the main bet is the rising product/growth analyst (budget-friendly, high ceiling). A ready Head/Lead is offered as a separate tier.

Tier B — Rising product/growth analyst · 275 people ★ MAIN BET

Data / Product / Growth / BI Analyst with 2–4 years in a fintech, crypto or marketplace team — already past junior, strong SQL + Python, started picking up dbt and product analytics (Amplitude / Mixpanel), grew fast (junior→middle in < 2 years, visible from position dates across a depth of 5–13 roles). High ceiling, low current cost, hungry for a role with more responsibility and direct access to C-level — all of which Brighty (a flat function, measurably down to one person) has in abundance. This is the direct answer to the gap: delivers numbers to the Growth and product teams immediately. Of these, 107 have a confirmed SQL + Python core, 63 show a clear trace of product methodology (retention / cohort / funnel / A-B).

CandidateCurrent roleDonorGeoStack coreScore
Syed Ghazanfer Rabbani Analytics Engineer Amplitude / Mixpanel dbt / BigQuery fintech domain Revolut UAE SQL + Python A+ 16
Peter Berna Williams Data Analyst (Product) Amplitude / Mixpanel dbt / BigQuery fintech domain Revolut Spain SQL + Python A+ 15.5
Carlos Tapia García Data Analyst Amplitude / Mixpanel dbt / BigQuery fintech domain Revolut Spain SQL + Python A+ 15.5
Daniel Rubas Lead Business Intelligence Analyst Amplitude / Mixpanel dbt / BigQuery fintech domain Bitpanda Austria SQL + Python A+ 15.5
Vasilen Tzanev Product Analyst Amplitude / Mixpanel dbt / BigQuery fintech domain Nexo Bulgaria SQL + Python A+ 15.5
Rita Margarida Costa Data Analyst Amplitude / Mixpanel fintech domain Revolut Portugal SQL + Python A+ 14.5
Mateus Trentz Data Analyst dbt / BigQuery fintech domain Revolut Portugal SQL + Python A+ 14.5
Dmitrii Kuznetsov Middle Data Analyst Amplitude / Mixpanel dbt / BigQuery fintech domain Yandex Spain SQL + Python A+ 14.5
Aleksas Ramaška Decision Scientist / Data Analyst fintech domain Vinted Lithuania SQL + Python A+ 14
Tomás Almeida Borges Data Analyst Engineer fintech domain Revolut Portugal SQL + Python A+ 13.5

Badges: "Amplitude / Mixpanel" = a product analytics tool was found; "dbt / BigQuery" = modern analytics-engineering stack; "fintech domain" = experience in fintech / crypto / payments. This is not a hypothesis, it is a line in the file. The examples deliberately surface candidates with a product signal (not pure ML).

Tier A — Senior / Proven · 87 people

Senior Data / Product Analyst, Analytics Engineer or Head/Lead of Analytics — already built retention / unit economics in regulated fintech, often as the sole or first analyst. They meet investor requirements immediately after the round and will not require building a data team around them — someone who has already survived in "solo analyst" mode will not burn out doing the same at Brighty. Of these, 87 are at Senior / Lead / Head analytics level. More expensive, but this is buying readiness, not potential.

CandidateCurrent roleDonorGeoStack coreScore
Tomas Peluritis Head of Data Amplitude / Mixpanel dbt / BigQuery fintech domain kevin. Lithuania SQL + Python A+ 19
Pavel Kudrautsau Head Of Data dbt / BigQuery fintech domain Paysera Lithuania SQL + Python A+ 18
Pavel K. Principal Data Scientist & Product Strategist Amplitude / Mixpanel fintech domain Bitpanda Spain SQL + Python A+ 16.5
Olga Juralevičiūtė Senior Data Scientist fintech domain TransferGo Lithuania SQL + Python B 16
Agrita Garnizone Head of Data fintech domain Nordigen Latvia B 16
Jean de Saint Michel Head of Data Platform & Engineering fintech domain Bitpanda UAE SQL + Python A+ 16
Robert Wasilewski Global Head of Analytics Engineering Amplitude / Mixpanel dbt / BigQuery fintech domain Revolut Poland A+ 15.5
Joaquim Costa Lead Data Analyst fintech domain Revolut Portugal SQL + Python A+ 15.5
Vitalii Radchenko Senior Data Scientist (Core) dbt / BigQuery fintech domain Revolut Spain SQL + Python B 15.5
Pavel Yarema Senior Business Intelligence Analyst dbt / BigQuery fintech domain Bitpanda Austria SQL + Python A+ 15.5

CAVEAT: the senior tier meets investor requirements immediately, but if budget matters more, a rising middle closes the same role for less on onboarding, with the loyalty of having "grown with the company". The tier choice = "readiness now" versus "budget + ceiling".

04Why they're ready to move right now

Readiness to move is detected structurally from career data — not a guess.

Domain fit (fintech / crypto)

192 of 370 have experience in fintech / crypto / payments. That removes 3–6 months of onboarding into KYC/AML metrics, crypto conversions and the EU geo-gate — the analyst immediately understands why cohorts behave the way they do in a regulated crypto-fiat product.

CIS relocators in the hubs

136 are graduates of strong data schools (Yandex / Sberbank / BTSDigital) who have already relocated to LT / LV / AE / EU (filtered on person-level geo, not company country). RU+EN, strong data school, post-relocation switch trigger. Brighty's team already includes KZ/CIS people — the cultural precedent exists.

CEE + Dubai locality

49 live in LT/LV/EE (Brighty's hubs), 36 in Dubai (the 2nd hub, ×9 of the team). Zero/minimal relocation — the lowest-risk, fastest hire.

Stack and method

46 with product tools (Amplitude / Mixpanel / GA4), 73 with analytics engineering (dbt / BigQuery / Snowflake), 106 with BI (Looker / Tableau). These are the people who build analytics, not just pull reports.

How we find the stack signal. Stack and method almost never sit in the profile headline — they live in the descriptions of past roles ("built a retention model on dbt", "cut CAC through cohort analysis", "ran A/B tests on Amplitude"). We read the entire career history of each candidate across a depth of 5–13 positions — that gives the real junior→middle→senior trajectory and the domain of past employers we filter on (by positions, not by current title). This is the key differentiator versus Apollo / ZoomInfo (2–3 positions).

05Dataset composition — and what we flagged for review

By function within the pool — a structured analytics funnel, not "everyone under the word analyst".

FunctionPeopleShare
Data / Product / Growth Analyst (IC)16946%
Analytics-adjacent (DS / insights / junior)10629%
Senior Analyst / Analytics Engineer5916%
Head / Lead of Analytics288%
Adjacent (data-alumni, now non-data leadership)51%
Adjacent (analytics-transferable)21%
Adjacent (data-alumni, now non-data role)10%

Honest finding: the broad word "analyst" also captures financial / credit / risk / AML / QA analysts — we deliberately cut them with a negative filter (those are different functions, outside this ICP). The "rising product/growth analyst" layer (169 people) is the direct answer to the measured gap.

Honest note on Data Scientists: 121 flagged for review. The ICP is product/growth analytics; a pure ML / research Data Scientist is an adjacent, but not the same, role. 121 profiles with a Data Scientist title without a clear product signal (no product tools and no method) we did not discard (some in crypto-fintech genuinely do product analytics), but we did not promote them into the hot tier and moved them into a separate ds-no-product-signal-review segment — so you can confirm interest before outreach rather than spend a slot blind. The hot shortlist (A+/A = 77) is title-verified analysts (Data / Product / BI Analyst, Analytics Engineer, Head of Analytics), without ML-flagged DS. Of these, 31 carry a clear product signal in the text (tools / method); for the rest it isn't marked in the profile — that's a question for the interview, not grounds to exclude (the field is incompletely populated).

Geography (top 8)

Spain
61
Germany
55
Lithuania
45
United Kingdom
39
Netherlands
38
UAE
36
Bulgaria
20
Portugal
17

06What you get as a file

The full dataset: JSONL / CSV / Excel + ready-made segments. Every profile — career depth, education, skills, location, contacts (where present), score and tier. Quality is measured, not claimed.

  1. leads.xlsx — Excel with all 155 fields across 370 candidates.
  2. leads.csv / leads.jsonl — for CRM and programmatic processing.
  3. segments/ — ready-made slices: rising product/growth analyst (the main bet), senior-proven, analytics-lead-ready, SQL+Python core, product tools, analytics-engineering, method signal, BI, domain fit, crypto-native, CIS data schools, warm Revolut channel, CEE-local, Dubai hub, active/alumni, ds-for-review, with email, by each donor.
Request the dataset: Request this dataset ↗ — 370 candidates, all formats + segments.
Quality metricValue
Profiles in the dataset370
Fields per profile (min · avg · max · union)99 · 143 · 152 · 155
Outreach-ready (email / phone / profile)100%
Email (combined)36.8% (136)
With SQL+Python core / domain fit107 / 192
Hot A+/A (of which with a clear product signal)77 (31)
Email from a former employer (total / among hot)60 / 33
Flagged for review (DS without product signal)121

We provide email and phone only from verified sources — where there is none, it's NULL; we do not invent contacts. Stack and method are a signal from the profile text: the absence of a mark ≠ the absence of a skill, so make the final check at the interview. 60 profiles (of which 33 are in the hot tier) are flagged email-domain-mismatch — a contact at a former employer that may bounce; check before mass outreach. This is not a dataset defect but an honest per-row flag.

07How to read on from here

This is the sixth and final role from report №5 — all 6 of Brighty's key roles now have a verified dataset with scoring, segments and contacts. The same format can be assembled for any role and company: name it, and we'll build it.

★ All 6 supply roles ready: AML / MLRO · CISO / Information Security · CFO / finance · UX Lead / design · Customer Success · Data Analyst (this one). The full set of talent datasets for Brighty's hiring is complete.

Want a report like this for your company?

Tell us your target company or ICP and we'll deliver the dataset + a short analysis in the same format.

Request your report — hi@outricher.com ↗
Outricher · professional graph of 1.17B profiles · @outricher · hi@outricher.com
MEASURED · Outricher data · 2026-06-28